This isn't a big issue, but bear in mind the FDF is very keen on reminding us we need a credible defense. It is the main line they feed us when they justify our nationwide mandatory conscript service. It also comes up when new material is being considered or when existing systems are not dropped. I remember it was being talked about when we decided to keep on using land mines.
So now we see the army doesn't have the muscle to purchase shoes when necessary. The ban is lifted and orders will proceed sometime in March 2011 after which new recruits will be again issued two pairs of boots, just like reservists will have a pair for use when in training.
Not that we should expect the military to fully equip our troops in case of conflict, the military passport issued to me in 2002 came with an insert which clearly states in case of mobilization I am to report to my unit with serviceable outdoor clothing suitable for the time of year and items such as a backpack, sleeping bag, compass, knife, field axe, flashlight some spare underwear and a washing kit. The FDF promises to purchase these items.
At least in 2002 they promised us that most of the reservists would be issued an assault rifle in case of mobilization. That would come in handy, seeing as I've received training for the RK-62 assault rifle, the FDF LMG and a 66 KES 88 LAW. If they couldn't issue me a similar assault rifle they would have to retrain me. So that's a credibility boost, right? Now I can expect boots too.
I've got military issue boots, at least two uniforms, lots of olive green underwear and tons of shoe polish. I'm prepared!
ReplyDelete